linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce STM32 system bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <98aa92e9-9ac0-0fe4-a140-ac478e261f94@foss.st.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:45:15 +0100
From:   Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <loic.pallardy@...com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce STM32 system bus

Hello Greg,

I've put the "RFC" tag on the the patch set as it is based on bindings 
that are currently under review. It has been submitted with the idea to 
support the bindings proposed by Oleksii. Apart from this and the 
comments made by Krzysztof, there is indeed no more "work" planned on 
this change.

Should the "RFC" tag be omitted for the next version?

Best regards,
Gatien

On 12/22/22 17:39, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 11:04:57AM +0100, Gatien Chevallier wrote:
>> Document STM32 System Bus. This bus is intended to control firewall
>> access for the peripherals connected to it.
> 
> Why is this an "RFC"?  That usually means "I have more work to do on it,
> but I'll send it out now anyway".  What work is left?
> 
> And for most code, I know I don't review "RFC" changes as there are too
> many "real" patches being submitted where people think their code is
> ready to be merged.  Other reviewers might think otherwise, but be aware
> of this...
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h