linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce STM32 system bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 07:10:48 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@...s.st.com>
Cc:     alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Oleksii_Moisieiev@...m.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        loic.pallardy@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce STM32 system bus

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 10:45:15AM +0100, Gatien CHEVALLIER wrote:
> Hello Greg,
> 
> I've put the "RFC" tag on the the patch set as it is based on bindings that
> are currently under review. It has been submitted with the idea to support
> the bindings proposed by Oleksii. Apart from this and the comments made by
> Krzysztof, there is indeed no more "work" planned on this change.
> 
> Should the "RFC" tag be omitted for the next version?

If you feel it is ready to be merged, yes, then please remove it,
otherwise it's obviously not ready and will not be merged :)

thanks,

greg k-h