[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <7BA3F66A-097C-44F2-AAC8-35ADBEAE7E12@joelfernandes.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 16:56:31 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/63] 5.10.162-rc1 review
> On Jan 4, 2023, at 12:29 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:16:07PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:13:30AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.162 release.
>>> There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:12:47 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.162-rc1.gz
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>
>> Testing fails. Could you please pick these 2 up?
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221230153215.1333921-1-joel@joelfernandes.org
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221230153215.1333921-2-joel@joelfernandes.org/
>
> That is not a regression from 5.10.161, right?
Yes it is not.
> This release is only for
> the io_uring stuff to make sure that backport was done correctly.
>
> The current "to apply" queue for the stable trees is very large right
> now due to everyone waiting to get tiny things into -rc1 instead of
> before then, so the above two are still not yet queued up, sorry.
Sure not a problem, I can resend again later if it is still not queued.
Thanks,
- Joel
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists