linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/63] 5.10.162-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y7UOtInxdmaIP9nH@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2023 06:29:24 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/63] 5.10.162-rc1 review

On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:16:07PM +0000, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:13:30AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.162 release.
> > There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 05 Jan 2023 08:12:47 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.162-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> 
> Testing fails. Could you please pick these 2 up?
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221230153215.1333921-1-joel@joelfernandes.org
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221230153215.1333921-2-joel@joelfernandes.org/

That is not a regression from 5.10.161, right?  This release is only for
the io_uring stuff to make sure that backport was done correctly.

The current "to apply" queue for the stable trees is very large right
now due to everyone waiting to get tiny things into -rc1 instead of
before then, so the above two are still not yet queued up, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h