[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230104151241.GA13268@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 16:12:41 +0100
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: fix missing pd_online_fn() while activating
policy
Hello.
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 07:28:33PM +0800, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
> If the policy defines pd_online_fn(), it should be called after
> pd_init_fn(), like blkg_create().
Is this based only on code review or has it some negative effects?
I assume this would affect hot-plugged (read after cgroup creation) devices.
I took a cursory look at:
blkcg_init_disk
blkg_create
pol->pd_init_fn(blkg->pd[i]);
pol->pd_online_fn(blkg->pd[i]);
blk_throtl_init
blkcg_activate_policy
pol->pd_init_fn(blkg->pd[i]);
?? pol->pd_online_fn(blkg->pd[i]);
I.e. the pd_online_fn is already called and pd_init_fn is called 2nd
time?
Thanks,
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists