[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b559d1d-31e4-6049-4548-451bf7afb4f4@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:43:02 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-cgroup: fix missing pd_online_fn() while activating
policy
Hi, Michal
在 2023/01/04 23:12, Michal Koutný 写道:
> Hello.
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 07:28:33PM +0800, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>> If the policy defines pd_online_fn(), it should be called after
>> pd_init_fn(), like blkg_create().
>
> Is this based only on code review or has it some negative effects?
This is based only on code review, currently the only negative effects
is that root blkg from blk-throtl won't call pd_online_fn().
>
> I assume this would affect hot-plugged (read after cgroup creation) devices.
>
> I took a cursory look at:
>
> blkcg_init_disk
> blkg_create
> pol->pd_init_fn(blkg->pd[i]);
> pol->pd_online_fn(blkg->pd[i]);
> blk_throtl_init
> blkcg_activate_policy
> pol->pd_init_fn(blkg->pd[i]);
> ?? pol->pd_online_fn(blkg->pd[i]);
>
> I.e. the pd_online_fn is already called and pd_init_fn is called 2nd
> time?
No, this is not true, before blkcg_activate_policy() is called,
blkg_create() won't see this policy, hence pd_init_fn/pd_online_fn won't
be called from blkg_create().
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists