[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a25b930-e003-6326-86ab-4d8cdc9b7da5@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 07:23:49 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] serial: Make uart_handle_cts_change() status param
bool
On 04. 01. 23, 16:15, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> Convert uart_handle_cts_change() to bool which is more appropriate
> than unsigned int.
>
> Cleanup callsites from operations that are not necessary with bool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
...
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -3285,11 +3285,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uart_handle_dcd_change);
> /**
> * uart_handle_cts_change - handle a change of clear-to-send state
> * @uport: uart_port structure for the open port
> - * @status: new clear to send status, nonzero if active
> + * @status: new clear to send status, true if active
ANyone else having troubles to parse "new clear to send status"?
> *
> * Caller must hold uport->lock.
> */
> -void uart_handle_cts_change(struct uart_port *uport, unsigned int status)
> +void uart_handle_cts_change(struct uart_port *uport, bool status)
This should be "bool active" then.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists