[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <271c3316-e464-9dc6-f703-26a5986a00de@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 14:36:54 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: kernel@...kajraghav.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hare@...e.de, snitzer@...nel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
hch@....de, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, gost.dev@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] block: add a new helper bdev_{is_zone_start,
offset_from_zone_start}
On 1/6/23 00:33, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> +static inline sector_t bdev_offset_from_zone_start(struct block_device *bdev,
> + sector_t sec)
> +{
> + if (!bdev_is_zoned(bdev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return sec & (bdev_zone_sectors(bdev) - 1);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool bdev_is_zone_start(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sec)
> +{
> + if (!bdev_is_zoned(bdev))
> + return false;
> +
> + return bdev_offset_from_zone_start(bdev, sec) == 0;
> +}
A nit: 'sector_t sector' is much more common in the block layer than
'sector_t sec'. Please consider changing 'sec' into 'sector'.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists