| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 15:34:58 -0800
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@...zon.com>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, ebiggers@...nel.org, mengcc@...zon.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: another use-after-free in ep_remove_wait_queue()
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 2:49 PM Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@...zon.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We found the following use-after-free with userspace code polling on
> a pressure file in a non-root cgroup using epoll.
>
> [ 57.183661] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x76/0x130
> [ 57.186662] Write of size 4 at addr ffff888114976428 by task a.out/2426
>
> [ 57.190551] CPU: 0 PID: 2426 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.2.0-rc2+ #16
> [ 57.193384] Hardware name: Amazon EC2 c5a.large/, BIOS 1.0 10/16/2017
> [ 57.196272] Call Trace:
> [ 57.197565] <TASK>
> [ 57.198714] dump_stack_lvl+0x8f/0xc0
> [ 57.200494] print_report+0x16c/0x4e0
> [ 57.202084] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x76/0x130
> [ 57.204077] kasan_report+0xc3/0xf0
> [ 57.205587] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> [ 57.207760] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x76/0x130
> [ 57.209685] kasan_check_range+0x2d2/0x310
> [ 57.211477] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x76/0x130
> [ 57.213355] remove_wait_queue+0x25/0x130
> [ 57.215102] ep_free+0x12d/0x220
> [ 57.216506] ep_eventpoll_release+0x3c/0x40
> [ 57.218254] __fput+0x32b/0x700
> [ 57.221486] task_work_run+0x1db/0x230
> [ 57.224885] exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xfd/0x100
> [ 57.228662] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x20/0x40
> [ 57.232360] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x90
> [ 57.235691] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
> [ 57.239572] RIP: 0033:0x7fadf96e1c44
> [ 57.242865] Code: 00 00 b8 ff ff ff ff eb 9c b8 ff ff ff ff eb 95 e8 01 e2 01 00 90 8b 05 2a ac 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 11 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 3a f3 c3 48 83 ec 18 48 89 7c 24 08 e8 e4 a0
> [ 57.255244] RSP: 002b:00007ffd1d1b7b98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003
> [ 57.261714] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fadf96e1c44
> [ 57.266293] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffd1d1b7b60 RDI: 0000000000000004
> [ 57.270979] RBP: 00007ffd1d1b7bf0 R08: 00000000004007e0 R09: 00007fadf9a0f240
> [ 57.275856] R10: 00000000000006ba R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000004005e0
> [ 57.280478] R13: 00007ffd1d1b7cd0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> [ 57.285059] </TASK>
>
> [ 57.290402] Allocated by task 2426:
> [ 57.293705] kasan_set_track+0x3d/0x60
> [ 57.297102] __kasan_kmalloc+0x85/0x90
> [ 57.300491] psi_trigger_create+0x155/0x850
> [ 57.304040] pressure_write+0x200/0x510
> [ 57.307508] cgroup_file_write+0x1de/0x3e0
> [ 57.310949] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x27d/0x380
> [ 57.314601] vfs_write+0x7d7/0xaa0
> [ 57.317891] ksys_write+0xd7/0x1a0
> [ 57.321152] do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
> [ 57.324496] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> [ 57.330887] Freed by task 2429:
> [ 57.334053] kasan_set_track+0x3d/0x60
> [ 57.337448] kasan_save_free_info+0x27/0x40
> [ 57.340977] ____kasan_slab_free+0x11d/0x170
> [ 57.344570] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x87/0x150
> [ 57.348236] __kmem_cache_free+0xcb/0x180
> [ 57.351710] psi_trigger_destroy+0x458/0x550
> [ 57.355274] cgroup_file_release+0x96/0x110
> [ 57.358779] kernfs_drain_open_files+0x238/0x420
> [ 57.362519] kernfs_drain+0x191/0x2a0
> [ 57.365901] __kernfs_remove+0x3a6/0x600
> [ 57.369363] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc2/0x120
> [ 57.373073] cgroup_addrm_files+0x90f/0xcf0
> [ 57.376610] cgroup_destroy_locked+0x48a/0x730
> [ 57.380260] cgroup_rmdir+0x2b/0x130
> [ 57.383650] kernfs_iop_rmdir+0x17a/0x230
> [ 57.387201] vfs_rmdir+0x196/0x410
> [ 57.390442] do_rmdir+0x1c7/0x3f0
> [ 57.393651] __x64_sys_rmdir+0x45/0x50
> [ 57.397000] do_syscall_64+0x43/0x90
> [ 57.400340] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> [ 57.406689] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888114976400
> which belongs to the cache kmalloc-128 of size 128
> [ 57.414907] The buggy address is located 40 bytes inside of
> 128-byte region [ffff888114976400, ffff888114976480)
>
> [ 57.425474] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
> [ 57.429541] page:000000008c5ecb31 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x114976
> [ 57.436725] flags: 0x2fffff80000200(slab|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
> [ 57.441235] raw: 002fffff80000200 ffff8881000418c0 dead000000000100 dead000000000122
> [ 57.447793] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000100010 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
> [ 57.454274] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>
> [ 57.460990] Memory state around the buggy address:
> [ 57.464744] ffff888114976300: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
> [ 57.471126] ffff888114976380: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> [ 57.477447] >ffff888114976400: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
> [ 57.483833] ^
> [ 57.487541] ffff888114976480: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> [ 57.493976] ffff888114976500: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 fc fc
>
> Here is the simple repro.
>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <sys/epoll.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> int main(void)
> {
> const char trigger_str[] = "some 100000 1000000";
> int fd, epfd;
> struct epoll_event event;
> struct epoll_event events[1];
>
> fd = open("/cgroup2/test/cpu.pressure", O_RDWR);
> write(fd, trigger_str, sizeof(trigger_str));
> epfd = epoll_create(1);
> event.events = EPOLLPRI | EPOLLET;
> event.data.fd = fd;
> epoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, fd, &event);
> epoll_wait(epfd, events, 1, -1); /* returns after rmdir */
> sleep(5);
> close(epfd);
> close(fd);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> # mkdir /cgroup2
> # mount -t cgroup2 none /cgroup2
> # mkdir /cgroup2/test
> # ./a.out &
> # rmdir /cgroup2/test
>
> Looks like calling wake_up_pollfree() in psi_trigger_destroy() can properly
> clear the queue and then avoid this use-after-free, but POLLFREE wasn't
> considered enough there for the past similar issue[1]. While
> wake_up_pollfree() could *also* be called in psi_trigger_destroy(), it may
> be awkward and there can be more appropriate solution. It would be great if
> experts could have a look.
Thanks for the report, Munehisa. I'll look into this over the weekend
or on Monday.
Suren.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/11/16/264
>
>
> Regards,
> Munehisa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists