[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7fra/JE003tcpQq@integral2>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:35:39 +0700
From: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@...weeb.org>
To: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
io-uring Mailing List <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, liqiong@...china.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix some spelling mistakes in comment
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:12:42PM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote:
> @@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static __cold void io_tctx_exit_cb(struct callback_head *cb)
> * When @in_idle, we're in cancellation and it's racy to remove the
> * node. It'll be removed by the end of cancellation, just ignore it.
> * tctx can be NULL if the queueing of this task_work raced with
> - * work cancelation off the exec path.
> + * work cancellation off the exec path.
> */
> if (tctx && !atomic_read(&tctx->in_idle))
> io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)work->ctx);
> @@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd)
> bool loop = false;
>
> io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current);
> - /* read completions before cancelations */
> + /* read completions before cancellations */
"cancelations" is not a typo.
"cancelations" and "cancellations" are both valid spellings. The former
is predominantly used in the US, while the latter is predominantly used
in the UK.
--
Ammar Faizi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists