linux-kernel - [PATCH] io_uring: fix some spelling mistakes in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230106091242.20288-1-yuzhe@nfschina.com>
Date:   Fri,  6 Jan 2023 17:12:42 +0800
From:   Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>
To:     axboe@...nel.dk, asml.silence@...il.com
Cc:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, liqiong@...china.com,
        Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring: fix some spelling mistakes in comment

Fix typos in comment.

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@...china.com>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 58ac13b69dc8..99074d5fe195 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static void io_eventfd_flush_signal(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	 * Eventfd should only get triggered when at least one event has been
 	 * posted. Some applications rely on the eventfd notification count
 	 * only changing IFF a new CQE has been added to the CQ ring. There's
-	 * no depedency on 1:1 relationship between how many times this
+	 * no dependency on 1:1 relationship between how many times this
 	 * function is called (and hence the eventfd count) and number of CQEs
 	 * posted to the CQ ring.
 	 */
@@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static __cold void io_tctx_exit_cb(struct callback_head *cb)
 	 * When @in_idle, we're in cancellation and it's racy to remove the
 	 * node. It'll be removed by the end of cancellation, just ignore it.
 	 * tctx can be NULL if the queueing of this task_work raced with
-	 * work cancelation off the exec path.
+	 * work cancellation off the exec path.
 	 */
 	if (tctx && !atomic_read(&tctx->in_idle))
 		io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)work->ctx);
@@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd)
 		bool loop = false;
 
 		io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current);
-		/* read completions before cancelations */
+		/* read completions before cancellations */
 		inflight = tctx_inflight(tctx, !cancel_all);
 		if (!inflight)
 			break;
-- 
2.11.0