[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230106170048.p4d3rq6kehmf3adp@blmsp>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 18:00:48 +0100
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, mturquette@...libre.com,
sboyd@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, johnson.wang@...iatek.com,
miles.chen@...iatek.com, fparent@...libre.com,
chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com, sam.shih@...iatek.com,
y.oudjana@...tonmail.com, nfraprado@...labora.com,
rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com, ryder.lee@...nel.org,
daniel@...rotopia.org, jose.exposito89@...il.com,
yangyingliang@...wei.com, pablo.sun@...iatek.com,
weiyi.lu@...iatek.com, ikjn@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/23] clk: mediatek: cpumux: Propagate struct device
where possible
Hi Angelo,
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 03:07:10PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 5:43 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
> >
> > Take a pointer to a struct device in mtk_clk_register_cpumuxes() and
> > propagate the same to mtk_clk_register_cpumux() => clk_hw_register().
> > Even though runtime pm is unlikely to be used with CPU muxes, this
> > helps with code consistency and possibly opens to commonization of
> > some mtk_clk_register_(x) functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
>
> As with the gates patch, could we make the |struct device *| parameter the
> first one? Also for this case I think we could even drop the
> |struct device_node *| parameter.
Reviewed-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
clk_hw_register and others are using the device pointer as first
parameter as well. So I think it makes sense to do it the same way as
ChenYu suggested.
Best,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists