[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230108163128.2860894d@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 16:31:28 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] selftests/tracing: Fix some testcases for recent
change
On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 22:32:08 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> This includes some patches to fix 2 issues on ftrace selftests.
>
> - eprobe filter and eprobe syntax test case were introduced but it
> doesn't check whether the kernel supports eprobe filter. Thus the
> new test case fails on the kernel which has eprobe but not support
> eprobe filter. To solve this issue, add a filter description to
> README file [1/3] and run the filter syntax error test only if the
> description is found in the README file [2/3].
>
> - Recently objtool adds prefix symbols for the function padding nops,
> and the probepoint test case fails because this probepoint test case
> tests whether the kprobe event can probe the target function and the
> functions next to the target function. But the prefix symbols can not
> be probed. Thus these prefix symbols must be skipped [3/3].
>
> Thank you,
>
> ---
>
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) (3):
> tracing/eprobe: Fix to add filter on eprobe description in README file
> selftests/ftrace: Fix eprobe syntax test case to check filter support
> selftests/ftrace: Fix probepoint testcase to ignore __pfx_* symbols
>
>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists