[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230109212413.mcypwhpmtsj3rgj3@viti.kaiser.cx>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:24:13 +0100
From: Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] staging: r8188eu: make rtl8188eu_inirp_init a void
function
Hi Pavel,
Thus wrote Pavel Skripkin (paskripkin@...il.com):
> Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx> says:
> > rtl8188eu_inirp_init's return value is not checked by its caller. Make
> > rtl8188eu_inirp_init a void function.
> Hm, shouldn't we actually check return value on caller side?
> This thing is called from netdev_open and issues urbs to read data from the
> device. So let's imagine that we fail on 1st iteration (for some reason):
> netdev_open() says all is OK, but driver does not communicate with the
> device.
your're right. It makes sense to relay the return value to _netdev_open.
We'd have to update/remove the intf_start pointer and usb_intf_start.
I'll resend the series without this patch and submit new patches for
relaying the error code.
Thanks & best regards,
Martin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists