[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y72nPcDDC/+10lYK@p183>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 20:58:21 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: introduce proc_statfs()
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:20:03PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Introduce proc_statfs() to replace simple_statfs(), so that
> f_bsize queried from statfs() can be consistent w/ the value we
> set in s_blocksize.
>
> stat -f /proc/
>
> Before:
> ID: 0 Namelen: 255 Type: proc
> Block size: 4096 Fundamental block size: 4096
> Blocks: Total: 0 Free: 0 Available: 0
> Inodes: Total: 0 Free: 0
>
> After:
> ID: 0 Namelen: 255 Type: proc
> Block size: 1024 Fundamental block size: 1024
> Blocks: Total: 0 Free: 0 Available: 0
> Inodes: Total: 0 Free: 0
4096 is better value is in fact.
seq_files allocate 1 page and fill it, therefore reading less than
PAGE_SIZE from /proc is mostly waste of syscalls.
I doubt anything uses f_bsize.
BTW this patch is not self contained.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists