[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0dca406a-e331-a8f7-da8d-95ba89705598@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:20:07 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: introduce proc_statfs()
On 2023/1/11 1:58, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:20:03PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Introduce proc_statfs() to replace simple_statfs(), so that
>> f_bsize queried from statfs() can be consistent w/ the value we
>> set in s_blocksize.
>>
>> stat -f /proc/
>>
>> Before:
>> ID: 0 Namelen: 255 Type: proc
>> Block size: 4096 Fundamental block size: 4096
>> Blocks: Total: 0 Free: 0 Available: 0
>> Inodes: Total: 0 Free: 0
>>
>> After:
>> ID: 0 Namelen: 255 Type: proc
>> Block size: 1024 Fundamental block size: 1024
>> Blocks: Total: 0 Free: 0 Available: 0
>> Inodes: Total: 0 Free: 0
>
> 4096 is better value is in fact.
>
> seq_files allocate 1 page and fill it, therefore reading less than
> PAGE_SIZE from /proc is mostly waste of syscalls.
Ah, thanks for correcting me, so, how about updating .s_blocksize and
.s_blocksize_bits to PAGE_SIZE and PAGE_SHIFT?
>
> I doubt anything uses f_bsize.
>
> BTW this patch is not self contained.
Oh, yes, my bad.
Thanks,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists