linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Fix sometimes-uninitialized warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230111172258.pzzvjzuxczkfiojj@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:22:58 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>
Cc:     alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, bvanassche@....org,
        quic_cang@...cinc.com, quic_xiaosenh@...cinc.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Fix sometimes-uninitialized
 warnings

On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 11:40:55PM +0100, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> 
> Compilation complains that two possible variables are used without
> initialization:
> 
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_cnt' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c:112:6: warning: variable 'sg_list' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> 
> Fix both warnings by adding initialization with sg_cnt = 0, sg_list = NULL.
> 
> Fixes: 6ff265fc5ef6 ("scsi: ufs: core: bsg: Add advanced RPMB support in ufs_bsg")
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Xiaosen He <quic_xiaosenh@...cinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>

Thanks for the patch!
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>

We also got a report from KernelCI:

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/llvm/63be5f73.170a0220.16f9f.8b91@mx.google.com/
Reported-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@...nelci.org>

> ---
>  drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
> index 0044029bcf7b..0d38e7fa34cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs_bsg.c
> @@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static int ufs_bsg_exec_advanced_rpmb_req(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct bsg_job *j
>  	struct ufs_rpmb_reply *rpmb_reply = job->reply;
>  	struct bsg_buffer *payload = NULL;
>  	enum dma_data_direction dir;
> -	struct scatterlist *sg_list;
> +	struct scatterlist *sg_list = NULL;
>  	int rpmb_req_type;
> -	int sg_cnt;
> +	int sg_cnt = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  	int data_len;
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
>