[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3268358.687JKscXgg@diego>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:31:59 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/13] riscv: fix jal offsets in patched alternatives
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2023, 18:10:15 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang:
> Alternatives live in a different section, so offsets used by jal
> instruction will point to wrong locations after the patch got applied.
>
> Similar to arm64, adjust the location to consider that offset.
>
> Co-developed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
looks good, thanks for fixing the issues Andrew and Conor pointed
out in the variant in my zbb series. I've now switched over to this one.
I guess as you said, we really should separate this out into a single patch
[or if Palmer is fine with that, just pick this one patch to apply until the
rest is ready]
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists