linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key checked cmpxchg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10ba824d-6174-2fc4-b58b-a914cc5524be@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:38:28 +0100
From:   Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] KVM: s390: Extend MEM_OP ioctl by storage key
 checked cmpxchg

On 1/10/23 21:26, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> User space can use the MEM_OP ioctl to make storage key checked reads
> and writes to the guest, however, it has no way of performing atomic,
> key checked, accesses to the guest.
> Extend the MEM_OP ioctl in order to allow for this, by adding a cmpxchg
> mode. For now, support this mode for absolute accesses only.
> 
> This mode can be use, for example, to set the device-state-change
> indicator and the adapter-local-summary indicator atomically.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   include/uapi/linux/kvm.h |   7 +++
>   arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h  |   3 ++
>   arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c  | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c |  41 +++++++++++++++-
>   4 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 55155e262646..452f43c1cc34 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -583,6 +583,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_mem_op {
>   		struct {
>   			__u8 ar;	/* the access register number */
>   			__u8 key;	/* access key, ignored if flag unset */
> +			__u8 pad1[6];	/* ignored */
> +			__u64 old_addr;	/* ignored if flag unset */

These 3 are only used for flag values >=4, no?
They aren't used for all flag values but for specific ones, right?