lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e69c4a70-5b50-a1d3-f972-534255cbb2b4@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:09:35 +0530
From:   Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
CC:     <agross@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>, <robimarko@...il.com>,
        <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/2] firmware: qcom: scm: Add wait-queue handling logic

Hey Bjorn,
Thanks for taking time to review the series.

On 1/10/23 23:37, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:07:45PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>> From: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>
>>
>> When the firmware (FW) supports multiple requests per VM, multiple requests
>> from the same/different VM can reach the firmware at the same time. Since
>> the firmware currently being used has limited resources, it guards them
>> with a resource lock and puts requests on a wait-queue internally and
>> signals to HLOS that it is doing so. It does this by returning a new return
>> value in addition to success or error: SCM_WAITQ_SLEEP. A sleeping SCM call
>> can be woken up by an interrupt that the FW raises.
>>
>>    1) SCM_WAITQ_SLEEP:
>>
>>    	When an SCM call receives this return value instead of success
>>    	or error, FW has placed this call on a wait-queue and has signalled
>> 	HLOS to put it to non-interruptible sleep.
>>
>> 	Along with this return value, FW also passes to HLOS `wq_ctx` -
>> 	a unique number (UID) identifying the wait-queue that it has put
>> 	the call on, internally. This is to help HLOS with its own
>> 	bookkeeping to wake this sleeping call later.
>>
>> 	Additionally, FW also passes to HLOS `smc_call_ctx` - a UID
>> 	identifying the SCM call thus being put to sleep. This is also
>> 	for HLOS' bookkeeping to wake this call up later.
>>
>> 	These two additional values are passed via the a1 and a2
>> 	registers.
>>
>> 	N.B.: The "ctx" in the above UID names = "context".
>>
>> The handshake mechanism that HLOS uses to talk to FW about wait-queue
>> operations involves two new SMC calls.
>>
>>    1) get_wq_ctx():
>>
>>      	Arguments: 	None
>>      	Returns:	wq_ctx, flags, more_pending
>>
>>      	Get the wait-queue context, and wake up either one or all of the
>>      	sleeping SCM calls associated with that wait-queue.
>>
>>      	Additionally, repeat this if there are more wait-queues that are
>>      	ready to have their requests woken up (`more_pending`).
>>
>>    2) wq_resume(smc_call_ctx):
>>
>>    	Arguments:	smc_call_ctx
>>
>>    	HLOS needs to issue this in response to receiving an
>>    	IRQ, passing to FW the same smc_call_ctx that FW
>>    	receives from HLOS via the get_wq_ctx() call.
>>
>> (The mechanism to wake a SMC call back up is described in detail below)
>>
>>   VM_1                     VM_2                            Firmware
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │      REQUEST_1         │                                 │
>>     ├────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────┤
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │                              ┌──┼──┐
>>     │                        │                              │  │  │
>>     │                        │     REQUEST_2                │  │  │
>>     │                        ├──────────────────────────────┼──┤  │
>>     │                        │                              │  │  │Resource
>>     │                        │                              │  │  │is busy
>>     │                        │       {WQ_SLEEP}             │  │  │
>>     │                        │◄─────────────────────────────┼──┤  │
>>     │                        │  wq_ctx, smc_call_ctx        │  │  │
>>     │                        │                              └──┼──┘
>>     │   REQUEST_1 COMPLETE   │                                 │
>>     │◄───────────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────┤
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │         IRQ                     │
>>     │                        │◄─-------------------------------│
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │      get_wq_ctx()               │
>>     │                        ├────────────────────────────────►│
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │◄────────────────────────────────┤
>>     │                        │   wq_ctx, flags, and            │
>>     │                        │        more_pending             │
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │ wq_resume(smc_call_ctx)         │
>>     │                        ├────────────────────────────────►│
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │      REQUEST_2 COMPLETE         │
>>     │                        │◄────────────────────────────────┤
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>     │                        │                                 │
>>
>> With the exception of get_wq_ctx(), the other SMC call wq_resume() can
>> return WQ_SLEEP (these nested rounds of WQ_SLEEP are not shown in the
>> above diagram for the sake of simplicity). Therefore, introduce a new
>> do-while loop to handle multiple WQ_SLEEP return values for the same
>> parent SCM call.
>>
>> Request Completion in the above diagram refers to either a success
>> return value (zero) or error (and not SMC_WAITQ_SLEEP)
>>
>> Also add the interrupt handler that wakes up a sleeping SCM call.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@...cinc.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>
>> v7:
>> - Move lookup + wait_for_completion into a single function in qcom_scm [Bjorn]
>> - Simplify completion retrieval [Bjorn]
>>
>> v6:
>> - Fix misc. nits in the scm driver [Krzysztof]
>>
>> v5:
>> - Handle the wake_one/wake_all flags [Guru]
>> - Rename flag handler to qcom_scm_waitq_wakeup [Bjorn]
>> - Resume scm call can return ebusy as well handle that scenario by retrying
>>    the original smc call and not the resume call
>>
>> v4:
>> - platform_set_drvdata will be used by __scm_smc_do_quirk_handle_waitq to
>>    get access to scm struct from device so retain it
>> - Use a single completion as it satisfies all of the current usecases [Bjorn]
>> - Inline scm_get_wq_ctx [Bjorn]
>> - Convert all pr_err to dev_err [Bjorn]
>> - Handle idr_destroy in a thread safe manner [Bjorn]
>> - Misc. Style fixes [Bjorn]
>>
>> v3:
>> - Fixup irq handling so as not to affect SoCs without the interrupt.
>> - Fix warnings reported by kernel test-bot.
>>
>>   drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c     | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.h     |  8 +++
>>   3 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c
>> index d111833364ba..30999f04749c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-smc.c
>> @@ -52,29 +52,101 @@ static void __scm_smc_do_quirk(const struct arm_smccc_args *smc,
>>   	} while (res->a0 == QCOM_SCM_INTERRUPTED);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void __scm_smc_do(const struct arm_smccc_args *smc,
>> -			 struct arm_smccc_res *res, bool atomic)
>> +static void fill_wq_resume_args(struct arm_smccc_args *resume, u32 smc_call_ctx)
>>   {
>> -	int retry_count = 0;
>> +	memset(resume->args, 0, sizeof(resume->args[0]) * ARRAY_SIZE(resume->args));
>> +
>> +	resume->args[0] = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL,
>> +					ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64, ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP,
>> +					SCM_SMC_FNID(QCOM_SCM_SVC_WAITQ, QCOM_SCM_WAITQ_RESUME));
>> +
>> +	resume->args[1] = QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1);
>> +
>> +	resume->args[2] = smc_call_ctx;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int scm_get_wq_ctx(u32 *wq_ctx, u32 *flags, u32 *more_pending)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct arm_smccc_args get_wq_ctx = {0};
>> +	struct arm_smccc_res get_wq_res;
>> +
>> +	get_wq_ctx.args[0] = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL,
>> +				ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64, ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP,
>> +				SCM_SMC_FNID(QCOM_SCM_SVC_WAITQ, QCOM_SCM_WAITQ_GET_WQ_CTX));
>> +
>> +	/* Guaranteed to return only success or error, no WAITQ_* */
>> +	__scm_smc_do_quirk(&get_wq_ctx, &get_wq_res);
>> +	ret = get_wq_res.a0;
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	*wq_ctx = get_wq_res.a1;
>> +	*flags  = get_wq_res.a2;
>> +	*more_pending = get_wq_res.a3;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __scm_smc_do_quirk_handle_waitq(struct device *dev, struct arm_smccc_args *waitq,
>> +					   struct arm_smccc_res *res)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct arm_smccc_args resume;
>> +	u32 wq_ctx, smc_call_ctx, flags;
>> +	struct arm_smccc_args *smc = waitq;
>> +
>> +	do {
>> +		__scm_smc_do_quirk(smc, res);
>> +
>> +		if (res->a0 == QCOM_SCM_WAITQ_SLEEP) {
>> +			wq_ctx = res->a1;
>> +			smc_call_ctx = res->a2;
>> +			flags = res->a3;
>> +
>> +			if (!dev)
>> +				return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +
>> +			ret = qcom_scm_lookup_completion(wq_ctx);
>> +			if (ret)
>> +				return ret;
>> +
>> +			fill_wq_resume_args(&resume, smc_call_ctx);
>> +			smc = &resume;
>> +		}
>> +	} while (res->a0 == QCOM_SCM_WAITQ_SLEEP);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __scm_smc_do(struct device *dev, struct arm_smccc_args *smc,
>> +			struct arm_smccc_res *res, bool atomic)
>> +{
>> +	int ret, retry_count = 0;
>>   
>>   	if (atomic) {
>>   		__scm_smc_do_quirk(smc, res);
>> -		return;
>> +		return 0;
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	do {
>>   		mutex_lock(&qcom_scm_lock);
>>   
>> -		__scm_smc_do_quirk(smc, res);
>> +		ret = __scm_smc_do_quirk_handle_waitq(dev, smc, res);
>>   
>>   		mutex_unlock(&qcom_scm_lock);
>>   
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +
>>   		if (res->a0 == QCOM_SCM_V2_EBUSY) {
>>   			if (retry_count++ > QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_MAX_RETRY)
>>   				break;
>>   			msleep(QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_WAIT_MS);
>>   		}
>>   	}  while (res->a0 == QCOM_SCM_V2_EBUSY);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>>   
>> @@ -83,7 +155,7 @@ int __scm_smc_call(struct device *dev, const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
>>   		   struct qcom_scm_res *res, bool atomic)
>>   {
>>   	int arglen = desc->arginfo & 0xf;
>> -	int i;
>> +	int i, ret;
>>   	dma_addr_t args_phys = 0;
>>   	void *args_virt = NULL;
>>   	size_t alloc_len;
>> @@ -135,13 +207,17 @@ int __scm_smc_call(struct device *dev, const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
>>   		smc.args[SCM_SMC_LAST_REG_IDX] = args_phys;
>>   	}
>>   
>> -	__scm_smc_do(&smc, &smc_res, atomic);
>> +	/* ret error check follows after args_virt cleanup*/
>> +	ret = __scm_smc_do(dev, &smc, &smc_res, atomic);
>>   
>>   	if (args_virt) {
>>   		dma_unmap_single(dev, args_phys, alloc_len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>>   		kfree(args_virt);
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>>   	if (res) {
>>   		res->result[0] = smc_res.a1;
>>   		res->result[1] = smc_res.a2;
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>> index cdbfe54c8146..19ac506a9b1f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>>    */
>>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>   #include <linux/init.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>   #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>>   #include <linux/export.h>
>>   #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> @@ -13,6 +14,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/qcom_scm.h>
>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>>   #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
>> @@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ struct qcom_scm {
>>   	struct clk *iface_clk;
>>   	struct clk *bus_clk;
>>   	struct icc_path *path;
>> +	struct completion waitq_comp;
>>   	struct reset_controller_dev reset;
>>   
>>   	/* control access to the interconnect path */
>> @@ -63,6 +66,9 @@ static const u8 qcom_scm_cpu_warm_bits[QCOM_SCM_BOOT_MAX_CPUS] = {
>>   	BIT(2), BIT(1), BIT(4), BIT(6)
>>   };
>>   
>> +#define QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ONE	BIT(0)
>> +#define QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ALL	BIT(1)
>> +
>>   static const char * const qcom_scm_convention_names[] = {
>>   	[SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN] = "unknown",
>>   	[SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32] = "smc arm 32",
>> @@ -1325,11 +1331,79 @@ bool qcom_scm_is_available(void)
>>   }
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_scm_is_available);
>>   
>> +static struct completion *qcom_scm_lookup_wq(struct qcom_scm *scm, u32 wq_ctx)
> 
> This could either be seen as a remnant of the older versions of this
> patch, or a signalling of "place implementation here". I dislike both...
> 
> Please rename it qcom_scm_assert_valid_wq_ctx() and just reference
> &scm->waitq_comp directly in the two places below.

ack

> 
>> +{
>> +	/* assert wq_ctx is zero */
>> +	if (wq_ctx != 0) {
>> +		dev_err(scm->dev, "No waitqueue found for wq_ctx %d\n", wq_ctx);
> 
> I think you should be more specific here, perhaps:
> 
> 	"Firmware unexpectedly passed non-zero wq_ctx\n"
> 
> And then as suggested a comment stating what needs to be done when that
> happens.

ack

> 
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return &scm->waitq_comp;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int qcom_scm_lookup_completion(u32 wq_ctx)
>> +{
>> +	struct completion *wq = NULL;
> 
> You assign it on the very next line, no need to do so here.

I'll just reference it directly from the scm struct.

> 
>> +
>> +	wq = qcom_scm_lookup_wq(__scm, wq_ctx);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(wq))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(wq);
>> +
>> +	wait_for_completion(wq);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int qcom_scm_waitq_wakeup(struct qcom_scm *scm, unsigned int wq_ctx, bool wake_all)
>> +{
>> +	struct completion *wq_to_wake;
> 
> "wq" would be sufficient.

I'll just reference it directly from the scm struct.

> 
> Thanks,
> Bjorn
> 
>> +
>> +	wq_to_wake = qcom_scm_lookup_wq(scm, wq_ctx);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(wq_to_wake))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(wq_to_wake);
>> +
>> +	if (wake_all)
>> +		complete_all(wq_to_wake);
>> +	else
>> +		complete(wq_to_wake);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t qcom_scm_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct qcom_scm *scm = data;
>> +	u32 wq_ctx, flags, more_pending = 0;
>> +
>> +	do {
>> +		ret = scm_get_wq_ctx(&wq_ctx, &flags, &more_pending);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(scm->dev, "GET_WQ_CTX SMC call failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +			goto out;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (flags != QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ONE &&
>> +		    flags != QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ALL) {
>> +			dev_err(scm->dev, "Invalid flags found for wq_ctx: %u\n", flags);
>> +			goto out;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		ret = qcom_scm_waitq_wakeup(scm, wq_ctx, !!(flags & QCOM_SMC_WAITQ_FLAG_WAKE_ALL));
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			goto out;
>> +	} while (more_pending);
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   {
>>   	struct qcom_scm *scm;
>>   	unsigned long clks;
>> -	int ret;
>> +	int irq, ret;
>>   
>>   	scm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*scm), GFP_KERNEL);
>>   	if (!scm)
>> @@ -1402,6 +1476,19 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	__scm = scm;
>>   	__scm->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>   
>> +	init_completion(&__scm->waitq_comp);
>> +
>> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> +	if (irq < 0) {
>> +		if (irq != -ENXIO)
>> +			return irq;
>> +	} else {
>> +		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(__scm->dev, irq, NULL, qcom_scm_irq_handler,
>> +						IRQF_ONESHOT, "qcom-scm", __scm);
>> +		if (ret < 0)
>> +			return dev_err_probe(scm->dev, ret, "Failed to request qcom-scm irq\n");
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	__get_convention();
>>   
>>   	/*
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.h b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.h
>> index db3d08a01209..018e9867d55a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.h
>> @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ struct qcom_scm_res {
>>   	u64 result[MAX_QCOM_SCM_RETS];
>>   };
>>   
>> +int qcom_scm_lookup_completion(u32 wq_ctx);

I'll rename ^^ into qcom_scm_wait_for_wq_completion instead.

>> +int scm_get_wq_ctx(u32 *wq_ctx, u32 *flags, u32 *more_pending);
>> +
>>   #define SCM_SMC_FNID(s, c)	((((s) & 0xFF) << 8) | ((c) & 0xFF))
>>   extern int __scm_smc_call(struct device *dev, const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
>>   			  enum qcom_scm_convention qcom_convention,
>> @@ -129,6 +132,10 @@ extern int scm_legacy_call(struct device *dev, const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
>>   #define QCOM_SCM_SMMU_CONFIG_ERRATA1		0x03
>>   #define QCOM_SCM_SMMU_CONFIG_ERRATA1_CLIENT_ALL	0x02
>>   
>> +#define QCOM_SCM_SVC_WAITQ			0x24
>> +#define QCOM_SCM_WAITQ_RESUME			0x02
>> +#define QCOM_SCM_WAITQ_GET_WQ_CTX		0x03
>> +
>>   /* common error codes */
>>   #define QCOM_SCM_V2_EBUSY	-12
>>   #define QCOM_SCM_ENOMEM		-5
>> @@ -137,6 +144,7 @@ extern int scm_legacy_call(struct device *dev, const struct qcom_scm_desc *desc,
>>   #define QCOM_SCM_EINVAL_ARG	-2
>>   #define QCOM_SCM_ERROR		-1
>>   #define QCOM_SCM_INTERRUPTED	1
>> +#define QCOM_SCM_WAITQ_SLEEP	2
>>   
>>   static inline int qcom_scm_remap_error(int err)
>>   {
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ