[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y74cXN4SP7FNtSl3@T590>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 10:18:04 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/6] genirq/affinity: Abstract APIs from managed irq
affinity spread
Hello Thomas, Jens and guys,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:28:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hello,
>
> irq_build_affinity_masks() actually grouping CPUs evenly into each managed
> irq vector according to NUMA and CPU locality, and it is reasonable to abstract
> one generic API for grouping CPUs evenly, the idea is suggested by Thomas
> Gleixner.
>
> group_cpus_evenly() is abstracted and put into lib/, so blk-mq can re-use
> it to build default queue mapping.
>
> blk-mq IO perf data is observed as more stable, meantime with big
> improvement, see detailed data in the last patch.
>
> Please consider it for v6.3!
>
> V4:
> - address comments from John, not export the API, given so far no
> module uses this symbol
> - add maintainer entry for new added lib/group_cpus.c
> - rebase on 6.2
Any chance to take a look at this patchset?
thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists