[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <31c07acb-adcf-3c7e-c415-fa2cd67fd12f@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:01:56 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Thermal ACPI APIs for generic trip points
On 11/01/2023 15:49, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 12:52 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Can I consider these changes ok for thermal/bleeding-edge ?
>>
>>
> Hi, Daniel,
>
> In general, the patch looks good to me.
> But can you give me more time so that I can test them on my test box by
> this week?
Ah, yes, definitively. If you have a test box for these changes that is
awesome.
Do you have a suggestion for a x86 platform to test quark_dts,
processor_thermal_device_pci and intel_soc_dts_iosf ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists