lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2023 16:01:56 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com" 
        <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Thermal ACPI APIs for generic trip points

On 11/01/2023 15:49, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 12:52 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Can I consider these changes ok for thermal/bleeding-edge ?
>>
>>
> Hi, Daniel,
> 
> In general, the patch looks good to me.
> But can you give me more time so that I can test them on my test box by
> this week?

Ah, yes, definitively. If you have a test box for these changes that is 
awesome.

Do you have a suggestion for a x86 platform to test quark_dts, 
processor_thermal_device_pci and intel_soc_dts_iosf ?


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ