[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea4380ed951317c0a2cc472adff04256e95c232c.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 02:13:13 +0000
From: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
CC: "srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Thermal ACPI APIs for generic trip points
Hi, Daniel,
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 16:01 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/01/2023 15:49, Zhang, Rui wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 12:52 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > Can I consider these changes ok for thermal/bleeding-edge ?
> > >
> > >
> > Hi, Daniel,
> >
> > In general, the patch looks good to me.
> > But can you give me more time so that I can test them on my test
> > box by
> > this week?
>
> Ah, yes, definitively. If you have a test box for these changes that
> is
> awesome.
Yeah. I have one to test both drivers.
>
> Do you have a suggestion for a x86 platform to test quark_dts,
> processor_thermal_device_pci and intel_soc_dts_iosf ?
intel_soc_dts_iosf is for Baytrail platform. Both Baytrail and Quark
are nearly 10 years old, and I don't have any of them.
For processor_thermal_device_pci, it should be available on Alderlake
platforms. And I have an internal platform which I can help test the
patches.
thanks,
rui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists