linux-kernel - Re: Patch "net/ulp: prevent ULP without clone op from entering the LISTEN status" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230112105731.0da81d58@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:57:31 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        slipper.alive@...il.com, stable-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch "net/ulp: prevent ULP without clone op from entering the
 LISTEN status" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree

On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:49:28 +0100 Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:44:09PM +0100, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> > 
> > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > 
> >     net/ulp: prevent ULP without clone op from entering the LISTEN status
> > 
> > to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
> >     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary  
> 
> Oops, nope, this broke the build for 5.4 and older kernels, now
> dropping.

There's no clone op, right? If you're willing to futz with it I think
you just need to remove the "and the ops don't have ->clone" part of
the conditions. Any presence of ops on older kernels should make us
bail.