[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8BZboDOQ1I+VTAC@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 20:03:10 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
slipper.alive@...il.com, stable-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch "net/ulp: prevent ULP without clone op from entering the
LISTEN status" has been added to the 5.4-stable tree
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:57:31AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:49:28 +0100 Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:44:09PM +0100, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > >
> > > net/ulp: prevent ULP without clone op from entering the LISTEN status
> > >
> > > to the 5.4-stable tree which can be found at:
> > > http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> >
> > Oops, nope, this broke the build for 5.4 and older kernels, now
> > dropping.
>
> There's no clone op, right?
Correct.
> If you're willing to futz with it I think
> you just need to remove the "and the ops don't have ->clone" part of
> the conditions. Any presence of ops on older kernels should make us
> bail.
Ok, that should not be hard, I'll try messing with that tomorrow on the
train...
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists