linux-kernel - [PATCH] HID: amd_sfh: if no sensors are enabled, clean up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230112190131.24460-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2023 13:01:31 -0600
From:   Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To:     Basavaraj Natikar <basavaraj.natikar@....com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
CC:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Xaver Hugl <xaver.hugl@...il.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] HID: amd_sfh: if no sensors are enabled, clean up

It was reported that commit b300667b33b2 ("HID: amd_sfh: Disable the
interrupt for all command") had caused increased resume time on HP Envy
x360.

Before this commit 3 sensors were reported, but they were not actually
functional.  After this commit the sensors are no longer reported, but
also the resume time increased.

To avoid this problem explicitly look for the number of disabled sensors.
If all the sensors are disabled, clean everything up.

Fixes: b300667b33b2 ("HID: amd_sfh: Disable the interrupt for all command")
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2115
Reported-by: Xaver Hugl <xaver.hugl@...il.com>
Tested-by: Xaver Hugl <xaver.hugl@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
---
 drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c
index ab125f79408f2..7469691b4a633 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/amd-sfh-hid/amd_sfh_client.c
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ int amd_sfh_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata)
 	cl_data->num_hid_devices = amd_mp2_get_sensor_num(privdata, &cl_data->sensor_idx[0]);
 	if (cl_data->num_hid_devices == 0)
 		return -ENODEV;
+	cl_data->hid_dev_count = cl_data->num_hid_devices;
 
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&cl_data->work, amd_sfh_work);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&cl_data->work_buffer, amd_sfh_work_buffer);
@@ -301,12 +302,18 @@ int amd_sfh_hid_client_init(struct amd_mp2_dev *privdata)
 					cl_data->sensor_sts[i]);
 				goto cleanup;
 			}
+		} else {
+			mp2_ops->stop(privdata, cl_data->sensor_idx[i]);
+			status = amd_sfh_wait_for_response
+				(privdata, cl_data->sensor_idx[i], SENSOR_DISABLED);
+			cl_data->hid_dev_count--;
 		}
 		dev_dbg(dev, "sid 0x%x (%s) status 0x%x\n",
 			cl_data->sensor_idx[i], get_sensor_name(cl_data->sensor_idx[i]),
 			cl_data->sensor_sts[i]);
 	}
-	if (mp2_ops->discovery_status && mp2_ops->discovery_status(privdata) == 0) {
+	if (!cl_data->hid_dev_count ||
+	   (mp2_ops->discovery_status && mp2_ops->discovery_status(privdata) == 0)) {
 		amd_sfh_hid_client_deinit(privdata);
 		for (i = 0; i < cl_data->num_hid_devices; i++) {
 			devm_kfree(dev, cl_data->feature_report[i]);
-- 
2.34.1