[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <c89c1079-3d3e-48b0-9331-a2f052e9f215@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:53:32 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Lukas Bulwahn" <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: "Aaro Koskinen" <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
"Janusz Krzysztofik" <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@...mide.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] usb: remove OMAP USB Device Controller and OHCI support for
OMAP1/2 chips
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023, at 10:19, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:03 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> I see. Yes, probably, !(MACH_OMAP_H2 || MACH_OMAP_H3) is really in the
> current state of the repository "always true", and hence this
> dependency "depends on ISP1301_OMAP || !(MACH_OMAP_H2 ||
> MACH_OMAP_H3)" is always independent of ISP1301_OMAP.
>
> Are you going to fix up your commit "ARM: omap1: remove unused board
> files" with this change?
>
> Please ignore this patch then; patch 1 and 4 still seem good to pick, though.
Done, I've applied those two and fixed up the other patch.
Thanks a lot for your series!
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists