linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qusb2: do not define properties in "if" block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8GgNidy+Hhnnikp@matsya>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 23:47:26 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qusb2: do not define properties
 in "if" block

On 24-12-22, 16:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> It is more readable to define properties in top-level "properties:" and
> restrict them (if needed) per compatible in the "if" block.  Defining
> properties in "if" block  does not work correctly with
> additionalProperties:false:

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod