linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Documentation/RCU: Fix a typo in checklist.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:38:57 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Documentation/RCU: Fix a typo in checklist.rst

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 04:31:08PM +0800, Qiuxu Zhuo wrote:
> "Please not that you *cannot* rely..." probably has a typo.
> Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
> ---
> Not sure whether it's a too small typo to need this patch.
> If so, sorry for the noise. :-)

Not at all!  Queued for the v6.4 merge window, thank you.  (Not the
upcoming merge window, but the one after that.)

							Thanx, Paul

>  Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
>  	can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and
>  	prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues.
>  
> -	Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
> +	Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
>  	only in non-preemptible kernels.  Such code can and will break,
>  	especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>