linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/1] Documentation/RCU: Fix a typo in checklist.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230113083108.59302-1-qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2023 16:31:08 +0800
From:   Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Documentation/RCU: Fix a typo in checklist.rst

"Please not that you *cannot* rely..." probably has a typo.
Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Qiuxu Zhuo <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
---
Not sure whether it's a too small typo to need this patch.
If so, sorry for the noise. :-)

 Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
 	can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and
 	prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues.
 
-	Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
+	Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built
 	only in non-preemptible kernels.  Such code can and will break,
 	especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.
 
-- 
2.17.1