[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230113110616.111001-16-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:06:08 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: mturquette@...libre.com
Cc: sboyd@...nel.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, wenst@...omium.org,
johnson.wang@...iatek.com, miles.chen@...iatek.com,
fparent@...libre.com, chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com,
sam.shih@...iatek.com, y.oudjana@...tonmail.com,
nfraprado@...labora.com, rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com,
ryder.lee@...nel.org, daniel@...rotopia.org,
jose.exposito89@...il.com, yangyingliang@...wei.com,
pablo.sun@...iatek.com, msp@...libre.com, weiyi.lu@...iatek.com,
ikjn@...omium.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 15/23] clk: mediatek: mt8192: Join top_adj_divs and top_muxes
These two are both mtk_composite arrays, one dependent on another, but
that's something that the clock framework is supposed to sort out and
anyway registering them separately isn't going to ease the framework's
job in checking dependencies.
Put the contents of top_adj_divs in top_muxes to join them together
and register them in one shot.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
---
drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c | 16 +++-------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c
index d012a229274e..1ffff53bbe90 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c
@@ -698,9 +698,7 @@ static struct mtk_composite top_muxes[] = {
MUX(CLK_TOP_APLL_I2S7_M_SEL, "apll_i2s7_m_sel", apll_i2s_m_parents, 0x320, 23, 1),
MUX(CLK_TOP_APLL_I2S8_M_SEL, "apll_i2s8_m_sel", apll_i2s_m_parents, 0x320, 24, 1),
MUX(CLK_TOP_APLL_I2S9_M_SEL, "apll_i2s9_m_sel", apll_i2s_m_parents, 0x320, 25, 1),
-};
-
-static const struct mtk_composite top_adj_divs[] = {
+ /* APLL_DIV */
DIV_GATE(CLK_TOP_APLL12_DIV0, "apll12_div0", "apll_i2s0_m_sel", 0x320, 0, 0x328, 8, 0),
DIV_GATE(CLK_TOP_APLL12_DIV1, "apll12_div1", "apll_i2s1_m_sel", 0x320, 1, 0x328, 8, 8),
DIV_GATE(CLK_TOP_APLL12_DIV2, "apll12_div2", "apll_i2s2_m_sel", 0x320, 2, 0x328, 8, 16),
@@ -1079,7 +1077,7 @@ static int clk_mt8192_top_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
top_clk_data = mtk_alloc_clk_data(CLK_TOP_NR_CLK);
if (!top_clk_data)
- return;
+ return -ENOMEM;
r = mtk_clk_register_fixed_clks(top_fixed_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_fixed_clks), top_clk_data);
if (r)
@@ -1101,16 +1099,10 @@ static int clk_mt8192_top_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (r)
goto unregister_muxes;
- r = mtk_clk_register_composites(&pdev->dev, top_adj_divs,
- ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), base,
- &mt8192_clk_lock, top_clk_data);
- if (r)
- goto unregister_top_composites;
-
r = mtk_clk_register_gates(&pdev->dev, node, top_clks,
ARRAY_SIZE(top_clks), top_clk_data);
if (r)
- goto unregister_adj_divs_composites;
+ goto unregister_top_composites;
r = clk_mt8192_reg_mfg_mux_notifier(&pdev->dev,
top_clk_data->hws[CLK_TOP_MFG_PLL_SEL]->clk);
@@ -1125,8 +1117,6 @@ static int clk_mt8192_top_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
unregister_gates:
mtk_clk_unregister_gates(top_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_clks), top_clk_data);
-unregister_adj_divs_composites:
- mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), top_clk_data);
unregister_top_composites:
mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_muxes), top_clk_data);
unregister_muxes:
--
2.39.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists