[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230114013724.3943580-1-trix@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 20:37:24 -0500
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: njavali@...vell.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, qutran@...vell.com
Cc: GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: qla2xxx: Change qla_trim_buf,__qla_adjust_buf functions to static
Smatch reports
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c:1189:6: warning: symbol 'qla_trim_buf' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c:1221:6: warning: symbol '__qla_adjust_buf' was not declared. Should it be static?
These functions are only used in qla_mid.c, so they should be static.
Fixes: 1f8f9c34127e ("scsi: qla2xxx: edif: Reduce memory usage during low I/O")
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c
index c6ca39b8e23d..bd6bc1a968b2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mid.c
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ int qla_get_buf(struct scsi_qla_host *vha, struct qla_qpair *qp, struct qla_buf_
return 0;
}
-void qla_trim_buf(struct qla_qpair *qp, u16 trim)
+static void qla_trim_buf(struct qla_qpair *qp, u16 trim)
{
int i, j;
struct qla_hw_data *ha = qp->vha->hw;
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ void qla_trim_buf(struct qla_qpair *qp, u16 trim)
qp->id, trim, qp->buf_pool.num_alloc);
}
-void __qla_adjust_buf(struct qla_qpair *qp)
+static void __qla_adjust_buf(struct qla_qpair *qp)
{
u32 trim;
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists