[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230116165337.5810-1-ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:53:37 +0100
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] posix-timers: use atomic64_try_cmpxchg in __update_gt_cputime
Use atomic64_try_cmpxchg instead of atomic64_cmpxchg (*ptr, old, new) == old
in __update_gt_cputime. x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF flag,
so this change saves a compare after cmpxchg (and related move instruction
in front of cmpxchg).
Also, atomic64_try_cmpxchg implicitly assigns old *ptr value to "old" when
cmpxchg fails. There is no need to re-read the value in the loop.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index cb925e8ef9a8..2f5e9b34022c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -243,13 +243,12 @@ static void proc_sample_cputime_atomic(struct task_cputime_atomic *at,
*/
static inline void __update_gt_cputime(atomic64_t *cputime, u64 sum_cputime)
{
- u64 curr_cputime;
-retry:
- curr_cputime = atomic64_read(cputime);
- if (sum_cputime > curr_cputime) {
- if (atomic64_cmpxchg(cputime, curr_cputime, sum_cputime) != curr_cputime)
- goto retry;
- }
+ u64 curr_cputime = atomic64_read(cputime);
+
+ do {
+ if (sum_cputime <= curr_cputime)
+ return;
+ } while (!atomic64_try_cmpxchg(cputime, &curr_cputime, sum_cputime));
}
static void update_gt_cputime(struct task_cputime_atomic *cputime_atomic,
--
2.39.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists