[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8TUE3h/IJySDn11@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 04:35:31 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
haoxin <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 0/9] migrate_pages(): batch TLB flushing
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:42:08AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1187,10 +1187,13 @@ static int __migrate_folio_move(struct folio *src, struct folio *dst,
> int rc;
> int page_was_mapped = 0;
> struct anon_vma *anon_vma = NULL;
> + bool is_lru = !__PageMovable(&src->page);
>
> __migrate_folio_extract(dst, &page_was_mapped, &anon_vma);
>
> rc = move_to_new_folio(dst, src, mode);
> + if (!unlikely(is_lru))
> + goto out_unlock_both;
This reads a little awkwardly. Could it be:
if (likely(!is_lru))
... but honestly, I think the polarity here is wrong. LRU pages tend to
outnumber !LRU pages, so shouldn't this be:
if (unlikely(!is_lru)) {
just like it is in migrate_folio_unmap()?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists