[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8UFC/1vH/Y9PeBN@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 09:04:27 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
Cc: clabbe@...libre.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] usb: serial: add support for CH348
[ Please fix your mailer which generates broken Reply-To headers:
Reply-To: 20230106135338.643951-2-clabbe@...libre.com
]
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 10:05:18PM +0100, David Heidelberg wrote:
> Acked-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
>
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 1; i < CH348_MAXPORT; ++i) {
>
> One nitpick; it would be nice to have a "for" loop from C99+.
No, I prefer this as it stands (and we only have about 80 instances of
such fancy stuff outside of tooling it seems).
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists