[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Md65GUZ0XXd_35gzS8SJQAHXG9neE4ZCxZXBr0q2nOc-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 14:56:23 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: wcd934x: Use proper headers and drop OF_GPIO dependency
On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 1:00 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 10:03:47AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 7:25 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> > > #include <linux/module.h>
> > > -#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> >
> > Any reason for having it separately here?
>
> Yes. The idea is to emphasize the relationship between the driver and
> the subsystem it's written for.
>
> P.S. Thanks for applying the rest of my contribution.
>
We almost never do it and I prefer all linux/ headers to be grouped
together. I like separate sections for asm/ and local includes but
this is overkill IMO.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists