[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202301170927309483808@zte.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:27:30 +0800 (CST)
From: <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
To: <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<bagasdotme@...il.com>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v3] swap_state: update shadow_nodes for anonymous page
> What testing did you do of this? I have this crash in today's testing:
My test is this:
1.Configure zram for swap.
2.Run some program malloc and access large memory, make sure they
can cause swap.
3.Watch count_shadow_nodes() and shadow_lru_isolate() to make sure
that shadow_nodes are really shrinking by adding printk().
Really sorry for inadequate test, I will try more tests include drop_caches
by sysctl.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists