[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202301182017545851044@zte.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 20:17:54 +0800 (CST)
From: <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
To: <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <hannes@...xchg.org>,
<bagasdotme@...il.com>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v3] swap_state: update shadow_nodes for anonymous page
> i_lock is at offset 128 of struct inode, so that matches the dump.
> I believe that swapper_spaces never have ->host set, so I don't
> believe you've tested this patch since 51b8c1fe250d went in
> back in 2021.
You are totally right. I reproduce the panic in linux-next, and fix
it by patch v4. I should be more careful, since I used Linux 5.14
to test the patch which is a mistake.
Much apologies for the time wasted.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists