linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:23:49 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review

Hi Naresh,

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:57:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> NOTE:
> clang-nightly build errors noticed on defconfig of arm64. arm. x86_64,
> i386, riscv, s390 and powerpc.
> 
> include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: 'struct (unnamed at
> include/trace/events/initcall.h:27:1)' cannot be defined in
> '__builtin_offsetof'
>                 __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
>                 ^
> include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: initializer element is
> not a compile-time constant
>                 __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
>                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks for the report! I sent backports to avoid this issue and the one
reported on the 5.4 review but it appears they did not make this round
of stable updates.

https://lore.kernel.org/Y8TWrJpb6Vn6E4+v@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/

Hopefully it will be cleared up next round.

Cheers,
Nathan