linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y8axTFlEA8Cv2NPT@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:31:40 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/86] 5.15.89-rc1 review

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:23:49AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 04:57:52PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 21:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.89 release.
> > > There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:47:28 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.89-rc1.gz
> > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > greg k-h
> > 
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> > 
> > NOTE:
> > clang-nightly build errors noticed on defconfig of arm64. arm. x86_64,
> > i386, riscv, s390 and powerpc.
> > 
> > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: 'struct (unnamed at
> > include/trace/events/initcall.h:27:1)' cannot be defined in
> > '__builtin_offsetof'
> >                 __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
> >                 ^
> > include/trace/events/initcall.h:38:3: error: initializer element is
> > not a compile-time constant
> >                 __field_struct(initcall_t, func)
> >                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Thanks for the report! I sent backports to avoid this issue and the one
> reported on the 5.4 review but it appears they did not make this round
> of stable updates.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/Y8TWrJpb6Vn6E4+v@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
> 
> Hopefully it will be cleared up next round.

Yes, I will get to them after these are released, I figured it wasn't
that big of a rush...

thanks,

greg k-h