[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e3d8fba-b706-6b4e-2a19-c150ee85d152@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:55:23 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, amitk@...nel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] thermal/drivers/intel_powerclamp: Use powercap
idle-inject framework
On 17/01/2023 15:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:16 PM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 17/01/2023 03:07, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/intel/Kconfig
>>> index f0c845679250..6c2a95f41c81 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/Kconfig
>>> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ config INTEL_POWERCLAMP
>>> tristate "Intel PowerClamp idle injection driver"
>>> depends on X86
>>> depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL
>>> + select POWERCAP
>>> + select IDLE_INJECT
>>
>> Just a question, not a comment. As IDLE_INJECT depends on POWERCAP, is
>> it necessary to select POWERCAP also here ?
>
> Yes, it is.
>
> If IDLE_INJECT alone is selected, POWERCAP may not be and there will
> be a broken dependency.
Ok, thanks
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists