[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4f08f6642939e9707ee6427affe3d4aca06410a.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 07:08:25 -0800
From: srinivas pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, rafael@...nel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, amitk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] powercap: idle_inject: Add update callback
On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 12:13 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 17/01/2023 03:07, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > +struct idle_inject_device *idle_inject_register(struct cpumask
> > *cpumask)
> > +{
> > + return idle_inject_register_full(cpumask, NULL);
> > +}
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(idle_inject_register, IDLE_INJECT);
>
> Why not just add the parameter to idle_inject_register() ?
>
> There is only one user ATM
That was done in v1. But Rafael suggested to avoid changes to existing
kernel source.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists