[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d5435a0-b01f-9015-3d7f-525001bf77ad@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:24:55 -0800
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <rogerq@...nel.org>, <leon@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <vigneshr@...com>,
<srk@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] Fix CPTS release action in am65-cpts
driver
On 1/18/2023 1:54 AM, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> Delete unreachable code in am65_cpsw_init_cpts() function, which was
> Reported-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y8aHwSnVK9+sAb24@unreal
>
> Remove the devm action associated with am65_cpts_release() and invoke the
> function directly on the cleanup and exit paths.
>
> Changes from v2:
> 1. Drop Reviewed-by tag from Roger Quadros.
> 2. Add cleanup patch for deleting unreachable error handling code in
> am65_cpsw_init_cpts().
> 3. Drop am65_cpsw_cpts_cleanup() function and directly invoke
> am65_cpts_release().
>
> Changes from v1:
> 1. Fix the build issue when "CONFIG_TI_K3_AM65_CPTS" is not set. This
> error was reported by kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> at:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/202301142105.lt733Lt3-lkp@intel.com/
> 2. Collect Reviewed-by tag from Roger Quadros.
>
> v2:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230116044517.310461-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113104816.132815-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
>
> Siddharth Vadapalli (2):
> net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Delete unreachable error handling code
> net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw/cpts: Fix CPTS release action
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 7 ++-----
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c | 15 +++++----------
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Seems reasonable to me.
Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists