lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJhJPsXOX16SA0bb8zWJ=wSxshjv38g038cR0b3u0CDDm1aUQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2023 19:16:59 +0800
From:   Kelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: Add binding for Loongson-1 clock driver

Hi Krzysztof,

Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> 于2023年1月17日周二 18:47写道:
>
> On 17/01/2023 11:31, Kelvin Cheung wrote:
> >>> +  "#clock-cells":
> >>> +    const: 0
> >>> +
> >>> +  compatible:
> >>> +    enum:
> >>> +      - loongson,ls1b-clk-pll
> >>> +      - loongson,ls1b-clk-cpu
> >>> +      - loongson,ls1b-clk-ahb
> >>> +      - loongson,ls1c-clk-pll
> >>> +      - loongson,ls1c-clk-cpu
> >>> +      - loongson,ls1c-clk-ahb
> >>
> >> Are you registering single clocks? It looks like. No, make a proper
> >> clock controller.
> >
> > This binding contains two types of clock, pll-clk and div-clk.
> > Should I split the binding to two bindings files?
>
> No, you should register rather one clock controller. Why this have to be
> 3 separate clock controllers?
>
This sounds like a big change for the driver.
Could you please show me a good example of one clock controller?
Thanks very much!
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +  reg:
> >>> +    maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> +  clocks:
> >>> +    maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> +required:
> >>> +  - "#clock-cells"
> >>> +  - compatible
> >>> +  - clocks
> >>> +  - reg
> >>> +
> >>> +additionalProperties: false
> >>> +
> >>> +examples:
> >>> +  - |
> >>> +    clocks {
> >>
> >> No, not really related to the binding.
> >
> > Should I remove the "clocks" section?
>
> Yes.
>
> >>
> >>> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> >>> +        #size-cells = <1>;
> >>> +        ranges;
> >>> +
> >>> +        xtal: xtal {
> >>
> >> Incorrect in this context. Missing unit address.
> >
> > XTAL doesn't have reg property.
>
> Yeah, but DTS is not correct now, is it? If you doubt, build your DTB
> with W=1.
>
No doubt.
I just want to know the right way to declare XTAL.
Could you please show me an example?
Thanks again!
> >>
> >>> +            compatible = "fixed-clock";
> >>> +            #clock-cells = <0>;
> >>> +            clock-frequency = <33000000>;
> >>> +        };
> >>> +
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>


-- 
Best regards,

Kelvin Cheung

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ