lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1748643.VLH7GnMWUR@diego>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2023 18:21:28 +0100
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: alternative: proceed one more instruction for auipc/jalr
 pair

Am Sonntag, 15. Januar 2023, 17:28:11 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang:
> If we patched auipc + jalr pair, we'd better proceed one more
> instruction. Andrew pointed out "There's not a problem now, since
> we're only adding a fixup for jal, not jalr, but we should
> future-proof this and there's no reason to revisit an already fixed-up
> instruction anyway."
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>

Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ