linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: alternative: proceed one more instruction for auipc/jalr pair

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <167707802213.24438.17946403277180818321.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:00:22 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+linux-riscv@...nel.org
To:     Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, ajones@...tanamicro.com,
        heiko.stuebner@...ll.eu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: alternative: proceed one more instruction for
 auipc/jalr pair

Hello:

This patch was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>:

On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 00:28:11 +0800 you wrote:
> If we patched auipc + jalr pair, we'd better proceed one more
> instruction. Andrew pointed out "There's not a problem now, since
> we're only adding a fixup for jal, not jalr, but we should
> future-proof this and there's no reason to revisit an already fixed-up
> instruction anyway."
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - riscv: alternative: proceed one more instruction for auipc/jalr pair
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/91612cfb1736

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html