[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8mAuFCI2vHqNKvw@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 19:41:12 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] gpiolib: get rid of exessive
->of_gpio_ranges_fallback()
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 06:28:27PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Am 13.01.23 um 22:53 schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
> > The ->of_gpio_ranges_fallback() repeats the idea that lies behind
> > ->add_pin_ranges(), while the latter covers more cases that the former
> > hook. Drop the former one for good.
>
> i successful tested booting of this series with multi_v7_defconfig on
> Raspberry Pi 4 (with and without gpio-ranges in DTB):
>
> Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Thank you!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists