[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8qvIRXcCdLZjDCK@8bytes.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:11:29 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] iommu/sun50i: Allwinner D1 support
Hi Samuel,
On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 07:08:57PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> Samuel Holland (6):
> dt-bindings: iommu: sun50i: Add compatible for Allwinner D1
> iommu/sun50i: Track masters attached to the domain
> iommu/sun50i: Keep the bypass register up to date
> iommu/sun50i: Support variants without an external reset
> iommu/sun50i: Add support for the D1 variant
> riscv: dts: allwinner: d1: Add the IOMMU node
There is a conflict between these patches and changes in the IOMMU core
branch. With those merged in there is a compile warning about
sun50i_iommu_detach_domain() being unused. Fixing that requires removing
of 3-4 functions, which I am not sure is the right solution.
I pushed the arm/allwinner branch out to the iommu tree (with the core
branch merged in) and exluded it from next for now. Can you please have
a look and fix this up in a way that does not break the driver?
Once this is fixed I will include the arm/allwinner branch into my next
branch again.
Thanks,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists