linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: opp: constrain required-opps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e8b6034e-f163-6f6b-2f02-f2eda808950f@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:41:18 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: opp: constrain required-opps

On 20/01/2023 07:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/01/2023 05:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 19-01-23, 14:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Be specific how many required-opps are allowed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This change is independent, although logically is connected with my
>>> dtschema pull:
>>> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/95
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml     | 1 +
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-kryo-cpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
>>> index 47e6f36b7637..9b141a409191 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
>>> @@ -202,6 +202,7 @@ patternProperties:
>>>            for the functioning of the current device at the current OPP (where
>>>            this property is present).
>>>          $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
>>> +        maxItems: 1
>>
>> I may not under this property very well. What exactly does this line
>> say ? Asking as required-properties can have an array of phandles as
>> well.
>>
> 
> It says we can have maximum one item in "required-opps" in "opp" node
> and you are right that we could have here more. I'll fix it.

OK, this patch can be actually dropped. The dtschema will bring
constraints of 1-8 number of items here, which should cover all cases
for both opps - v2 and v2-kryo-cpu.

Best regards,
Krzysztof