[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <99519eb0-399d-4972-ae09-955a34830b55@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:05:59 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Sylwester Nawrocki" <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@...ex.cz>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@...e.com>,
"Charles Keepax" <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ASoC: samsung: remove DMA filter function and data
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, at 17:59, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 05:10:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>
>> This data is no longer passed by the platform code, so
>> there is no point passing it down at all.
>
> This breaks an x86 allmodconfig build:
I see, this patch still depends on the s3c24xx removal, which
is in soc/for-next and I used for testing. I see a similar
problem with the MMP platform in patch 2/5. The series here
is mostly older patches I did a while ago and rebased on top
of the boardfile removal, but it breaks when it gets applied
first.
Unless there is anything in here that you really want to apply
for 6.3, lets drop all five for now, and I'll resend it
after the dust has settled on the boardfile removal.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists